|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Expenditure January to December 2002 (Rs.)
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Month
|
Expenditure
|
|
DF
|
GTZ
|
Total
|
|
January
|
0
|
6,969,876
|
6,969,876
|
|
February
|
102,201
|
2,940,430
|
3,042,631
|
|
March
|
169,563
|
5,844,164
|
6,013,727
|
|
April
|
170,019
|
5,789,667
|
5,959,686
|
|
May
|
734,679
|
5,063,349
|
5,798,028
|
|
June
|
439,562
|
2,986,374
|
3,425,936
|
|
July
|
358,855
|
5,700,049
|
6,058,904
|
|
August
|
47,953
|
3,408,420
|
3,456,373
|
|
September
|
623,608
|
6,104,764
|
6,728,372
|
|
October
|
1,633,063
|
8,855,113
|
10,488,176
|
|
November
|
2,442,194
|
6,692,561
|
9,134,755
|
|
December
|
5,000,000
|
8,803,172
|
13,803,172
|
|
|
|
Total
|
11,721,697
|
69,157,939
|
80,879,636
|
|
|
|
Contribution in %
|
14.5
|
85.5
|
100
|
|
|
|
Estimated budget 2002
|
20,377,000
|
84,660,000
|
105,037,000
|
|
|
|
% Realisation of budget 2002 January - December
|
57.5
|
81.7
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
Expenditure 2001
|
12,352,924
|
78,360,633
|
90,713,557
|
|
% Realisation of budget 2001, January - December
|
61.8
|
93.9
|
87.7
|
|
 |
 |
|
Remark: 1 Euro = 92 Rs. (11/2002)
|
 |
 |
|
Comments: GTZ accounts for June were closed on 15 06 2002 for mid-term financial auditing; major recurrent expenditure items including salaries are included. Expenditure after 16 06 02 was be recorded in the July accounts. GTZ accounts for December were closed on 10 12 2002, all major activities were accounted for, rest is to be included in accounts for January 2003. As per April/May 2002 a total of Rs. 2 million was received as DF imprest. Additional imprest of Rs. 10 million was received in September 2002. Expenditure is within range. According to experience from 2000 and 2001, a step-wise expenditure and implementation pattern prevails: slow commencement of expenditure vs. speedy implementation of physical activities/village projects which results in a comparatively higher degree of physical performance vis-à-vis financial expenditure. This is expected to result in a higher expenditure in the 4th quarter 2002 as experienced 2001. Partner institutions need to be encouraged to increase their contribution in terms of budgets and manpower. Overall contribution is estimated at 10%. Communities are approached by IFSP to further increase their contribution to the many village development projects. Overall, CBO contribution to village development projects ranges between 25% and 65%.
|
 |
|
|
|
|